We are asking the National Grid to examine an alternative route for cable linking Suffolk and Kent due to fears that decisions are based on the cheapest cost rather than minimising cost to wildlife at “internationally important” National Nature Reserve.
We support energy providers exploring more routes to renewable energy, but it should not come at the cost of nature when alternatives are available.
National Grid has reopened the consultation into Sea Link and you have until 11th August 2024 to comment, for more details on how to submit your comment visit National Grid's website.
Read our response
Our response outlines these concerns:
- We are supportive of steps taken to develop renewable energy solutions, but it must not be at the cost of wildlife.
- We are not convinced that the proposed route can be adequately mitigated for.
- Our concern at the use of desktop surveys as a replacement to fuller and more detailed ecological surveys.
- The failure to carry out reptile, bat, water vole, otter, beaver, badger, invertebrate, and river aquatic surveys before the plans are submitted for a Development Consent Order (DCO).
- The loss of connectivity for wildlife through the development of 13.6 hectares of wildlife-rich land.
Our asks:
- We want National Grid to recognise the damage caused by Nemo Link and provide a detailed assessment to ensure improvements are made.
- We urge National Grid to review alternative routes for Sea Link.
Read our blog